Starship | SN10 | High-Altitude Flight Test

83 356 Просмотров 8 млн
Наука

On Wednesday, March 3, Starship serial number (SN10) successfully completed SpaceX’s third high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from our site in Cameron County, Texas.
Similar to the high-altitude flight tests of Starship SN8 and SN9, SN10 was powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN10 performed a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps were actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enabled a precise landing at the intended location. SN10’s Raptor engines reignited as the vehicle performed the landing flip maneuver immediately before successfully touching down on the landing pad!
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, SN10 experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly shortly after landing. These test flights are all about improving our understanding and development of a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration interplanetary flights, and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.

Комментарии

  1. steveissexy 1967.
    steveissexy 1967.
    12 часов назад

    Those rockets are a waste of time and money they're dangerous because you have to carry that fuel for landing which also makes it not economical it's a waste of time and money

  2. Guillermo Rivas
    Guillermo Rivas
    12 часов назад

    I love this

  3. Серж Владимирский
    Серж Владимирский
    16 часов назад

    Заебись мультфильм...

  4. Live Tuber
    Live Tuber
    17 часов назад

    beautiful CGI

  5. Brien Dunphy
    Brien Dunphy
    18 часов назад

    spaceX

  6. Brien Dunphy
    Brien Dunphy
    18 часов назад

    wach sorry

  7. iql dnr
    iql dnr
    19 часов назад

    Flying Squid

  8. Alexander Perdomo
    Alexander Perdomo
    21 час назад

    I think Elon musk did the the biggest bottle flip in juman history

    1. Alexander Perdomo
      Alexander Perdomo
      21 час назад

      Human history

  9. Buğra Çağrı YURT
    Buğra Çağrı YURT
    День назад

    rulife.info/home/video/raick7Cbmal5omc

  10. lifefunseeker today
    lifefunseeker today
    2 дня назад

    announcer sounds like a dude from the early 1950's

  11. [[[] S c o t b o X []]]
    [[[] S c o t b o X []]]
    2 дня назад

    " If it doesn't look like a duck, swim like a duck, and quack like a duck, then it probably isn't a duck "

  12. Jimmy B. Perez Lopez
    Jimmy B. Perez Lopez
    2 дня назад

    oyes desde el segundo 40 al 30 dice hay falla en el sistema

  13. rbxless
    rbxless
    2 дня назад

    The dislikes are from aliens

  14. Андрей Ка
    Андрей Ка
    2 дня назад

    Focusnici blin

  15. LeEpicPlayz Bacon
    LeEpicPlayz Bacon
    2 дня назад

    Me: shows off my laggy big thicc redstone rocket in random Minecraft creative worlds What I see 5:43

  16. Elias Ohm
    Elias Ohm
    3 дня назад

    So finally that attack is rebugged for enslavement of attackers pilots and defense missiles to aoid future outfalls...

  17. LoparceGaming826
    LoparceGaming826
    3 дня назад

    1:11 sn9 moment 1:31 sn8 moment

  18. PrimeIX
    PrimeIX
    3 дня назад

    gg

  19. Виталий Лукашин
    Виталий Лукашин
    4 дня назад

    👍👽

  20. emmm
    emmm
    4 дня назад

    It's so. incredibly. loud. WOw!

  21. Heybar Sequera
    Heybar Sequera
    4 дня назад

    Amazing job!

  22. stringsnare
    stringsnare
    4 дня назад

    Was that real footage or CGI interspersed with real footage?

    1. alexn310
      alexn310
      3 дня назад

      Real footage, all the way through. It was a livestream.

  23. HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?
    HOW DO YOU VENT LIKE BLUE?
    5 дней назад

    11:42 The best most unbelievable non CGI part of the video. Truly amazing shot

  24. andre troll
    andre troll
    6 дней назад

    MUY BUENO- UN ABRAZO Y UN BESO GORDO- El video mio se encuentra en el YOU TUBE y se llama- robotizado con cd 4017 , ne 555 pilotos El plano esta bajo el video. Andre Troll Kaiser

  25. Frank Tuckwell
    Frank Tuckwell
    6 дней назад

    Wow! I thankyou but i think the landing was far more astounding than the take off. Fantastic👍👍👍

  26. Glitched Blox
    Glitched Blox
    7 дней назад

    11:41 Looks like one of those movie scenes.

  27. bcvbb hyui
    bcvbb hyui
    7 дней назад

    Huge Respect for the Engineers, technicians and every worker at SpaceX 🙏💯.

  28. moises gonzales
    moises gonzales
    7 дней назад

    Es una nave de Flash Gordon, OMG!

  29. Caio Portella
    Caio Portella
    7 дней назад

    Cortaram a parte da explosão pq? HUAUHAUHHAUUH medo de cair ações elon musk?

  30. onemaxlight
    onemaxlight
    7 дней назад

    amazing..

  31. ICOD73
    ICOD73
    7 дней назад

    For a moment, it looked CGI.

    1. Alex Hendrix
      Alex Hendrix
      6 дней назад

      I watched this with my own eyes. 100% not CGI.

    2. bcvbb hyui
      bcvbb hyui
      7 дней назад

      Nice

  32. Ailsa Ni
    Ailsa Ni
    7 дней назад

    The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

  33. Igor Delta F.
    Igor Delta F.
    7 дней назад

    Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    1. Igor Delta F.
      Igor Delta F.
      День назад

      I wrote the wrong number of days. It's +400 to 500 days. Yet not for this decade. It's just my opinion, I hope I'm wrong. Thank you Matt for remind me to correct the days. Mr. Lmao, sorry to challenge your beliefs, if you don't agree write why you don't, instead of going straight to offensive words.

    2. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      2 дня назад

      @Lmao. My bad, I'll delete my response

    3. Lmao.
      Lmao.
      2 дня назад

      @Matt's RUlife stuff i was referring to the original comment

    4. Lmao.
      Lmao.
      2 дня назад

      so is this "argument" just some copy paste shit or are you part of a hivemind? i've seen this exact comment several times now.

    5. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      3 дня назад

      @Igor Delta F. I'm not sure where you get 1400 days from. During the closest approach, Mars is about a 6-9 month journey depending on which year you launch. That is maximum ~270 days trip one way to Mars. Perhaps you can be more specific on where you are getting your numbers from

  34. little Phoenix33
    little Phoenix33
    8 дней назад

    So Elon is iron man because that seems a lot like how iron man lands 😄👀

  35. vbddfy euuyt
    vbddfy euuyt
    8 дней назад

    happen live 😂

    1. Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      7 дней назад

      @Ailsa Ni what

    2. Ailsa Ni
      Ailsa Ni
      7 дней назад

      Демократия не долетит до Марса.

  36. Wayne Davis
    Wayne Davis
    9 дней назад

    did anyone else notice the hard bounce on landing or the drone view that looked like a cheap netflix movie?

  37. Olavo Neves
    Olavo Neves
    9 дней назад

    hi mates is very enjoy...blazz_zzzz

  38. SadSmileTV
    SadSmileTV
    9 дней назад

    congratulations

  39. JP muro
    JP muro
    9 дней назад

    What a bunch a shit! Can't believe y'all into this crap, CGI at the end got me cracking, no craft can do that TODAY , c'mon guys wake the fuck up

    1. alexn310
      alexn310
      3 дня назад

      @JP muro I have shown you multiple videos captured by amateurs, yet you still insist on cgi? What's your proof of CGI?

    2. alexn310
      alexn310
      3 дня назад

      @JP muro twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1377001018102276097 (That was SN11 the twitter pic, the links are SN10) rulife.info/home/video/rmqJ2MiFXXOXqYg rulife.info/home/video/oGimqLlph3yCrow

    3. alexn310
      alexn310
      3 дня назад

      @JP muro Well sure since that was filmed before the launch, lemme find you an amateur video of it. Theres also RGV Aerial Photography, and after the bellyflop Fail of SN11 they photgraphed it's nosecone laying on the ground im gonna get you some links.

    4. JP muro
      JP muro
      3 дня назад

      The real question lies beyond you and me and what we both think. Theres proof , that this is all a hoax. The question is why are you defending something that you can't prove, while all claims against what your trying to cling to have tons of facts , scientific, to back them up. My proof is right there , the cgi sequence at the end and the so called landing, i know its hard. We both have our own truths and i respect that, its just that's this is soo in our faces , its impossible not to see. And question its nature

    5. JP muro
      JP muro
      3 дня назад

      We'll , yes , i see it. It never took off. Did it? i mean i could go there tomorrow and take a pic, what's your proof? Where's the footage of take off and descent.

  40. JP muro
    JP muro
    9 дней назад

    Modern warfare CGI looks way better , should give em a call #elonmusk

    1. Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      7 дней назад

      Go to boca chica

    2. vbddfy euuyt
      vbddfy euuyt
      8 дней назад

      looks like a sci fi film

  41. Björn der Sachse
    Björn der Sachse
    9 дней назад

    Alles nur lüge

    1. Volksgenosse Erich Honecker
      Volksgenosse Erich Honecker
      8 дней назад

      Jede Person mit einem Donald Trump Profilbild hat still zu sein

    2. alexn310
      alexn310
      9 дней назад

      Go there yourself and see it for yourself

  42. Andy Harrison
    Andy Harrison
    9 дней назад

    This style of aircraft- is it "Flash Gordon" style? Or more Rocketeer?

  43. shark2v
    shark2v
    10 дней назад

    nice cgi

    1. Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      Cleanrial & Tronnzy - Roblox
      7 дней назад

      Go to boca chica

    2. alexn310
      alexn310
      10 дней назад

      You can go there yourself and see it

  44. John McGrath
    John McGrath
    10 дней назад

    Is this even real? It looks like cgi

    1. Juan Pablo Muro
      Juan Pablo Muro
      4 дня назад

      yeah, its because it is

    2. KELOO JBL ッ
      KELOO JBL ッ
      9 дней назад

      @alexn310 ye

    3. alexn310
      alexn310
      10 дней назад

      Go to Boca Chica, TX. You can see these getting built and flown in real time there.

  45. Lexi Talks
    Lexi Talks
    10 дней назад

    Nice

  46. แก่ง นาง
    แก่ง นาง
    10 дней назад

    ไอ้ควายน็อตบอกแผนทุกอย่างองค์กรNASA มีแผนอยากเป็นเบอร์1ของสหรัฐ.แล้วจะกลับไปใช้สถานีอวกาศสกดจิตทุกพรรคในสหรัฐ. ให้สนับสนุนเงินงบประมาณและมีตัวแทนNASA ที่หวังลงชิงต่ำแหน่งประธานาธิบดีสหรัฐ.ในสมัยต่อไป

  47. แก่ง นาง
    แก่ง นาง
    10 дней назад

    NASA กลายเป็นควายเมื่อถูกจับได้ว่าใ้ดาวเทียม และใช้สถานทีอวกาศทดลองมนุษย์ แต่สู้ความคิดมนุษย์ไม่ได้ โดยล่าสุดมีการเปิดเผย ชื่อบอร์ดผู้สั่งให้มนุษย์อวกาศบนสถานีอวกาศทำงานนี้

  48. Dave Timothy
    Dave Timothy
    10 дней назад

    12:00 I see starhopper

    1. KELOO JBL ッ
      KELOO JBL ッ
      9 дней назад

      ye love starhopper

  49. Saanichton Ministries
    Saanichton Ministries
    11 дней назад

    What I don’t like about the BFR is that there is no redundancy. Since fuel tanks are located in the nose cone, the crew cannot jettison from the top to escape an inevitable failure. Any manned flights must have redundancy.

    1. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      @Saanichton Ministries I agree ...,.. I don’t see nasa trusting SpaceX to place astronauts on Mars anytime soon until starship has at least 200-600 successful flights without incidence along with a smart AI to pilot starship However SpaceX does have falcon Heavy which is a proven space vehicle which I do see NASA trusting to send to the moon or Mars 🥲 Only the future will tell

    2. Saanichton Ministries
      Saanichton Ministries
      10 дней назад

      @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez fair enough. After a study of the STS program, it would be a nightmare to fly on a rocket. As a pilot myself, it is fascinating science. But way too risky. I don’t ever see the risk factor going away. Man it too flawed. Too much can go wrong in manned space flight. Too many extremes. I don’t know if it is ethical watching people kill themselves trying to go to Mars.... like the Mars one project?

    3. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      @Saanichton Ministries Is this suppose be hyperbole ....? Obviously not, they only flow 4 of them🤦🏻and their still very much prototype rockets That’s the equivalence of me asking you if you’d like a flight on the wrights brothers first plane .....

    4. Saanichton Ministries
      Saanichton Ministries
      10 дней назад

      @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez would you if you could?

    5. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      @Saanichton Ministries 🤨 ....... no I don’t

  50. Денис Петин
    Денис Петин
    11 дней назад

    Демократия не долетит до Марса.

  51. Pascal Fokx
    Pascal Fokx
    11 дней назад

    bravo let's Mars but if Mars gravity is lower than Earth it's going to be easy landing

    1. KELOO JBL ッ
      KELOO JBL ッ
      9 дней назад

      ouais

  52. NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON
    NOMOLAS GYROTOURBILLON
    11 дней назад

    FIREBALL XL5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  53. vince mm
    vince mm
    11 дней назад

    looks like a sci fi film

    1. KELOO JBL ッ
      KELOO JBL ッ
      9 дней назад

      ye but is real

  54. Carmen A. Cabello
    Carmen A. Cabello
    11 дней назад

    That is bull shit.

    1. It’s grant
      It’s grant
      9 дней назад

      @Shorty haha

    2. Shorty
      Shorty
      9 дней назад

      Carmen is close to karen

    3. It’s grant
      It’s grant
      11 дней назад

      @alexn310 thanks for saving me time

    4. alexn310
      alexn310
      11 дней назад

      Go and watch it yourself in boca chica before throwing bullshit accusations on RUlife

  55. Nebula Dust
    Nebula Dust
    11 дней назад

    24 7 live Mars cam coming soon : )

  56. collilab laboratorio visivo
    collilab laboratorio visivo
    11 дней назад

    Congrats, the best sci fi movie ever... it's incredible...

  57. Константин Голубятников
    Константин Голубятников
    12 дней назад

    Большая консервная банка с крыльями и двигателями..круто..поздравляю. Она еще и садиться..супер..

  58. Jephro321
    Jephro321
    12 дней назад

    I like how they cut out where it exploded anyway. Scrub X blew it again. At least they are consistent.

    1. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      3 дня назад

      They didn't cut anything out. The livestream ended shortly after landing. The explosion happened approx 7/8 minutes later

    2. K4!T3N
      K4!T3N
      6 дней назад

      Did you even seen the live stream?

    3. 69
      69
      7 дней назад

      This is the testing stage it's normal for things to blow up.

    4. alexn310
      alexn310
      11 дней назад

      @Jephro321 Was saying no to you stating they cut it out. Yes it exploded, but they didnt "cut it out" they ended the stream before it exploded.

    5. Jephro321
      Jephro321
      11 дней назад

      @alexn310 no what it blew up period.

  59. gilbondfac
    gilbondfac
    12 дней назад

    launch pad is too close to the installations ! dangerous

  60. KK FF
    KK FF
    13 дней назад

    When landing, the ignition is too late to correct. It needs to be 1-2 seconds earlier.The liquid fuel bunker should be divided into many small bunkers. Otherwise, if the whole bunker is turned vertically to horizontal, and then to vertical, the kinetic energy of the liquid itself can heat itself, causing expansion and deflagration

    1. Epic gamer Heap1
      Epic gamer Heap1
      5 дней назад

      @TimePro oh nvm I commented on this before I check Elon’s Tweet again I kinda didn’t remember the case

    2. TimePro
      TimePro
      5 дней назад

      @Epic gamer Heap1 Starship DOES use helium. After SN8s crash helium was put into the header tank of SN9 and SN10 to keep the tank pressurized and to prevent what happened to SN8. The helium was not supposed to be ingested.

    3. Epic gamer Heap1
      Epic gamer Heap1
      6 дней назад

      @TimePro An Starship does not have helium it only uses lox, methane fuel and pressure.

    4. TimePro
      TimePro
      7 дней назад

      @Epic gamer Heap1 That would be the case for SN8. SN10 has a hard landing because it ingested helium unexpectedly.

    5. Epic gamer Heap1
      Epic gamer Heap1
      8 дней назад

      It is not late according to Elon the single raptor engine was low on thrust to due low pressure inside of one of the tanks

  61. Dolores Izabella
    Dolores Izabella
    13 дней назад

    Вероятно, данная труба должна изображать носитель? Труба еле-еле взобралась на высоту 2 км и опустилась на землю. Как она собирается разогнать полезный груз до необходимой скорости? Это просто лапша для неграмотных.

  62. Huỳnh Đức Lê
    Huỳnh Đức Lê
    13 дней назад

    Need to add a parachute placed on top of the missile, when it falls straight. Need to improve the landing cooling system with the missile fixation axle after landing, I mean upgrading the yard system so that under it there is a shaft that can move and attach itself. as a landing gear. Maybe so, try using a flying parachute that cuts off when the Rocket is falling in mid-air. hm ... i think this idea can be sold, maybe n't 😄

    1. It’s grant
      It’s grant
      11 дней назад

      @Huỳnh Đức Lê Please for the love of god stop calling it a missile!

    2. alexn310
      alexn310
      11 дней назад

      @Huỳnh Đức Lê Yes, but they've already demonstrated they can land it without, and a parachute would also increase turnaround time for reuse. No need for one if propulsive landing can already yield the requested results.

    3. Huỳnh Đức Lê
      Huỳnh Đức Lê
      11 дней назад

      @alexn310 I know it's heavy, I mean the parachute is only used for a short time and then cut off when the missile is horizontal, except that the missile is placed at the top of the missile retained at the upright position. The parachute flew horizontally should be two moderate instead of one large enough to bear the load since it would be cut off to enter the final stage anyway. Although mainly used to reduce the force and help more stability, the possibility of wind, the weather will adversely affect the parachute and affect the missile but this problem can be improved. which is that you can use three parachutes to change your posture from horizontal to straight if you cut the parachute from the tail of the Rocket.

    4. alexn310
      alexn310
      11 дней назад

      Starship is too heavy for a parachute.

  63. nice guy
    nice guy
    13 дней назад

    what do you make of this: Take a look at the spaceX logo. (the actual logo). When I look at the logo SpaceX... I'm seeing: Spy.... then it says..... Cc .....(which in numerology is 33. Freemasons number). .... Then what looks like a symbol that appear to be something trying to 'break out of the dome". So that's one interpretation. Or another: Spa cex. Or in other words "Spa Sex". then the X in that looks like it could represent the act of sex (look carefully, it's crazy.) (boom-chic-a-waa-waa). Okay and a 3rd interpretation goes like this: SpaceX. Well "X" in english and internationally is a way of saying "No". So it's Space-NO. or in reverse: No Space. Which is pretty obvious these days. So those are 3 interpretations of the SpaceX LOGO.

    1. It’s grant
      It’s grant
      6 дней назад

      @nice guy I have no patience for people with special needs

    2. nice guy
      nice guy
      6 дней назад

      @69 no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

    3. nice guy
      nice guy
      6 дней назад

      @It’s grant no joke. All major corporate logos have something encoded.

    4. nice guy
      nice guy
      6 дней назад

      @K4!T3N The rockets are a scam. The cars are turning out to be a scam. Everyone who's used PayPal for any length of time knows it's a complete scam. What has he turned out yet that's actually a quality product that's not a lie or a scam??? The car is one thing, because it's just a really really shitty car. But the rockets are total frauds. It's not space exploration. It's a fireworks company. People are so dumb they don't understand anything.

    5. K4!T3N
      K4!T3N
      6 дней назад

      You milking it??.... bruuuuuuhhhh

  64. Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović
    Biljana Milinčić-Bežanović
    13 дней назад

    I think that the engineers made a mistake in constructing the "SN" rocket in that they practically limited the cooling of the "Raptor" engine. When the descent starts and the engines start, they start or do not work. Then air pressure is created which returns the heat to the "pot", so to speak. With Falcon rockets, the engines are free and they don't have that problem. One of the solutions is to drill holes in the lower part, next to the legs, or to line the engines with refractory material.

  65. hordes Coffee
    hordes Coffee
    13 дней назад

    Did anybody see the paper clip to the right of screen

    1. It’s grant
      It’s grant
      11 дней назад

      ?????????? please show when?????????? U OK DUDE????????????

  66. Die Katze
    Die Katze
    13 дней назад

    Well done folks . Keep it up .

  67. derms ter
    derms ter
    13 дней назад

    cgi did not improve much i guess..

    1. derms ter
      derms ter
      6 дней назад

      @K4!T3N you speak like you came from there lol

    2. K4!T3N
      K4!T3N
      6 дней назад

      @derms ter Go to boca chica, texas.... you're just lazy... lol

    3. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      @derms ter Theirs no need...... theirs hundreds of videos of the landing .......

    4. derms ter
      derms ter
      10 дней назад

      @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez you film the landing for me, i will believe

    5. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      @derms ter Go to boca chica in the next 2-3 weeks for SN15..........Lets see if its CGI at that point :)

  68. bouytt guyt
    bouytt guyt
    13 дней назад

    team.

  69. FinZdrav
    FinZdrav
    13 дней назад

    Оооо ес 🤑

  70. nothing is impossible
    nothing is impossible
    14 дней назад

    Cool

    1. Aistis Aukstikalnis
      Aistis Aukstikalnis
      12 дней назад

      rulife.info/home/video/jYmztbVnpXaE04A

  71. Ca Sneaks
    Ca Sneaks
    14 дней назад

    The mature pan practically observe because custard adventitiously refuse apud a unadvised captain. handy, dull black

  72. Jared Johanne Agustin
    Jared Johanne Agustin
    14 дней назад

    Eh 3 years left before the starship goes to Mars

    1. bouytt guyt
      bouytt guyt
      13 дней назад

      Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se s

  73. Ron Guada
    Ron Guada
    14 дней назад

    That.... was incredible!

  74. NOOBSTORE
    NOOBSTORE
    14 дней назад

    soooooo perfect

  75. dLedger XYZ
    dLedger XYZ
    14 дней назад

    Release the onboard camera during descent so that we can see space at that altitude. Oh nevermind, it's still the decades long grammar why not

    1. Brent Smith
      Brent Smith
      8 дней назад

      This flight went to 10km. If you want to 'see space at that altitude', whatever that means, you'd be better served by booking a flight on an airliner, as they can get up to 13km.

  76. Boris Wrongston
    Boris Wrongston
    14 дней назад

    more tax payers money down the Shitter

    1. Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez
      10 дней назад

      Your probably more dependent on the government tax payers than SpaceX is.........Their a private space company :)

    2. Ethan Roberts
      Ethan Roberts
      14 дней назад

      It's a private company, no tax payers money

  77. ceerw buty
    ceerw buty
    14 дней назад

    The reduced vibration of this missile is an unparalleled precedent

  78. Charalampos Avgenikos
    Charalampos Avgenikos
    14 дней назад

    You are coming from the SN11 flight test yesterday. 😂

    1. ForgeSkyGaming
      ForgeSkyGaming
      13 дней назад

      Yes 😭😭

  79. Максим Поскин
    Максим Поскин
    15 дней назад

    Это что то фантастическое

  80. Peter Zhu
    Peter Zhu
    15 дней назад

    The typical profit quantitatively scold because height formally mix notwithstanding a steadfast room. squeamish, incandescent net

  81. Daniel Perez
    Daniel Perez
    15 дней назад

    the geniuses just keep showing off.. very impressive

    1. ceerw buty
      ceerw buty
      14 дней назад

      Give it a few more minutes

  82. HYTECH REALATORS
    HYTECH REALATORS
    15 дней назад

    Congratulations 🎉👍

  83. one click
    one click
    15 дней назад

    The brash destruction joly add because tuna tellingly complain notwithstanding a helpful smile. quizzical, bright nation

  84. Mayo Garland
    Mayo Garland
    15 дней назад

    The dramatic club relevantly kiss because otter broadly scorch per a selfish aluminium. square, impolite temple

  85. Manuel Martin
    Manuel Martin
    15 дней назад

    pero tambien da la impresión que fue un lanzamiento controlado preparando algo a si como para un futuro aterrizaje esa son mis tres impresiones no se elucubro

  86. Manuel Martin
    Manuel Martin
    15 дней назад

    Comento : viendo lo bien me llama la atención la toma de este lanzamiento que alguien por favor me explique como se realizo esta toma que tipo de cámara se uso no se si existe tecnología para enfocar a tan larga distancia esta toma me hace recordar un programa de Tv de cuando era niño .( Thunderbirds Los Guardianes del Espacio ) que por cierto todo lo que allí emitían hoy día es una realidad ........................suspicacia

  87. Андрій Володимирович
    Андрій Володимирович
    15 дней назад

    Рогозин обосрался...

  88. Jay Paint
    Jay Paint
    15 дней назад

    Who’s here after SN11 blew up mid-flip maneuver

    1. XZenoRaptor
      XZenoRaptor
      6 дней назад

      @Jay Paint That's better!

    2. Jay Paint
      Jay Paint
      6 дней назад

      @XZenoRaptor Yeah that sounds a bit pessimistic. Let me fix that.

    3. Pol Valls
      Pol Valls
      14 дней назад

      mid-landing flip you mean

    4. XZenoRaptor
      XZenoRaptor
      14 дней назад

      It didn't blow up mid-flight...

  89. ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ
    ᛏᚤᚱᚠᛁᚾᚷᚱ
    15 дней назад

    Elon: NUCLEAR MISSILE COMIN' YOUR WAY!... Just kidding...

    1. Pol Valls
      Pol Valls
      14 дней назад

      a missile coming belly first?

  90. Ian Morton
    Ian Morton
    15 дней назад

    ...SpaceXtastic...!!!

  91. asterisKs
    asterisKs
    15 дней назад

    Shouldn't have launched sn11 in the fog, it was gonna blow up anyway even if the FTS didn't work. Welp sn15 here we come

    1. TimePro
      TimePro
      10 дней назад

      Wether there was fog or not it doesn’t change anything.

    2. Darth Revan
      Darth Revan
      11 дней назад

      That's what I said! And everyone went mental at me for calling SpaceX foolish as fuck for doing so. Completely rushed and wasted.

  92. Don
    Don
    15 дней назад

    great achievement, the landing is awesome, but somehow i don't like those type of spaceships. I believe one day we will go into one piece of fully controlled spaceship :)

    1. Don
      Don
      3 дня назад

      @Matt's RUlife stuff rather 500-1000y ;)

    2. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      3 дня назад

      @Don Yes it's very interesting indeed. Perhaps we will see such technological advancements 50-100 years from now.

    3. Don
      Don
      3 дня назад

      @Matt's RUlife stuff to travel to new stars also requires very high medical knowledge, Hybernation. if it will turn out no teleporation is possible (again quantum entanglement story) That quantum ental..... is imo one of the most important thing in whole science. Why it exists, what is that for? to carry mental state from dead body ? living after death in different dimention? We can't see any real connection of paired subparticules on distance, but maybe this is the effect of some processes from highe dimension. As scientist can't detect any even smallest fluctuation of anything during the process ,when changing state of 1st particular automatically change state of the other in time of ZERO at whatever distance. If I remember the latest test was performed at the distance of around 60kms or more. Although near death experience (NDE) happens only in our heads.... we cannot just say for 100% that it's due to processes in brain (very likely) but if we hear that those people could be in all places they want at the same time, that they even could tell what their family members (away) were doing while they were "out" of their bodies as they claim. Of course assuming that at least a few stories were real not just faked for any reason...as people can do a lot for money. ....selling stories etc. The most interesting is the case of neurosurgeon (not religiious one). What the nature uses that feature for. This is the most interesting thing for me in whole science...

    4. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      3 дня назад

      @Don You are right, of course, we don't know the technological advancements that will occur well into the future. The sort of technology that helps engineer an SSTO vehicle will likely be used to travel to new stars.

    5. Don
      Don
      3 дня назад

      @Matt's RUlife stuff nowadays impossible. Imagine getting energy from splitting atom ( a lot in atmosphere) on fly and later in space getting it from photons or other stuff, included magainzed energy from new kind of battery. Too early to even imagine how it may be in next 1000years. I bet the aim is not to carry too much fuel with the ship and that might be possible as you can get energy from anything.. what matters is to create proper devices which can do that. Also imagine that something might be hidden.. explain how works quantum entalngement... maybe we will be able to send small portions of energy if a source is millions kms away. If we can affect a state of an sub-atom particular on distance, that means a change. a change means that something happens if something happens you can get energy from that...as there is no action without energy. to change something = energy rises... so why not to connect millions of the particles to set entanglement on on those packets and do something with that on distance ;) In space you only needs energy to change velocity and direction of you vehicle... landing or starting from planets different storry as you have a lot of particules in atmospheres you can use to get that energy

  93. Syahrul Ridzuan
    Syahrul Ridzuan
    15 дней назад

    Yep, I knew it

  94. Neil Mcmac
    Neil Mcmac
    15 дней назад

    High altitude ? ??? It's a rocket , ten kilometers ( six miles ) is not high . Germany was sending rockets that high in 1944 . 76 years and no progress ??? . And this is an empty rocket , load her up with fuel and life support systems and this tin can will never leave the launch pad . MARS has nothing to fear

    1. 69
      69
      7 дней назад

      @Neil Mcmac so you're stuck in the past considering you said you lived through the 60s and 70s. You're hated for Elon Musk also seems to be getting in the way of your good judgment if you ever had any. Starship and Saturn v are not comparable. We did not have real reusable rockets in the 40s quit making up shit.

    2. Neil Mcmac
      Neil Mcmac
      8 дней назад

      @Pol Valls dollars to doughnuts says Musk picks up and leaves town before any of his make believe rockets ever reach orbit . He is just suckling as many dollars out of the system that he can , or are you one of those morons that really believe Musk is using his own money . Lay off the drugs and try to think ahead a little , you load that tin can up with supplies, life support, crew quarters and extra engines and fuel to orbit and de-orbit and you have a disaster waiting to happen . Nothing but a pipe dream .

    3. Pol Valls
      Pol Valls
      9 дней назад

      @Neil Mcmac falcon 9 landed at its 5th try and now it's the most reliable rocket. Starship had 4, and next prototype is full of new technologies successfully proven. Please, don't compare a mission to a test. The expectations are different, Saturn V was pioneering, Starship is so too. And Sn10 landed. SN11 tested advanced solutions, they learn from them and they will do the same, fly fail fix

    4. IsaQuest
      IsaQuest
      10 дней назад

      @Eduardo Rodriguez Vazquez yeah it wasnt a good paragraph but you get the point that im trying to make. again, you said it very well

    5. Neil Mcmac
      Neil Mcmac
      10 дней назад

      @IsaQuest because you don't learn anything if the damn thing is not balanced as it would be , or loaded as it would be . Musk is going ass backwards . Proving something that doesn't help him one little bit in the real world . Put weights in to make up for crew, fuel, live support . Now test it , Musk is testing on an empty can , the balance point will not be close to what a real ships balance would be ,,,,, so at the end of the day Musk has learned zero .

  95. haug0099
    haug0099
    15 дней назад

    Give it a few more minutes

  96. ToXiC_BigFatBaby
    ToXiC_BigFatBaby
    15 дней назад

    whos here after sn11

  97. Latortuga 007
    Latortuga 007
    15 дней назад

    🚀My rating: Starship SN8: 8/10 Starship SN9: 4/10 Starship SN10: 9/10 Starship SN11: 2/10 Gonna update my rating every time from now on.

    1. Matt's Youtube stuff
      Matt's Youtube stuff
      3 дня назад

      What is your rating based on? Level of excitement or what was achieved? I'm just curious as to how you gave SN11 a 2/10, you couldn't see a damn thing! lol I would argue that SN11 is an unfortunate 0/10 because of the fog, but from an engineering perspective a 10/10 because it helped them identify an issue that they need to fix for future missions.

    2. Pol Valls
      Pol Valls
      14 дней назад

      @IsaQuest no.

    3. Latortuga 007
      Latortuga 007
      14 дней назад

      @TimePro the leaning was cool too

    4. TimePro
      TimePro
      14 дней назад

      SN9 I'd say would be also 9/10. They fixed the header tank issue that was present in SN8s flight.

    5. Latortuga 007
      Latortuga 007
      14 дней назад

      @Starship SN10 ur welcome! ☺️

  98. Armchair Revolutionary
    Armchair Revolutionary
    15 дней назад

    Nutso!!lol...beautiful but nuts!!!congratulations to the whole team!!

  99. Efloor
    Efloor
    15 дней назад

    I remember when these looked like grain silos

  100. Gerald Wagner
    Gerald Wagner
    15 дней назад

    The trite market significantly harass because ship lilly glow without a empty history. wrong, depressed maraca